From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 14:05:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2305A37B401; Sun, 11 May 2003 14:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E401943FE9; Sun, 11 May 2003 14:05:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown[12.242.158.67]) by attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP id <20030511210508001003dhbse>; Sun, 11 May 2003 21:05:08 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h4BL7IKc054201; Sun, 11 May 2003 14:07:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.9/8.12.5/Submit) id h4BL7Axw054198; Sun, 11 May 2003 14:07:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swear@attbi.com) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jojo set sender to swear@attbi.com using -f To: Doug Barton References: <200305110053.h4B0rGd9004467@gothmog.gr> <20030511010700.GA4585@gothmog.gr> <20030511021605.GB8548@gothmog.gr> <20030511024527.GA9150@gothmog.gr> <20030510203753.H665@znfgre.qbhto.arg> From: swear@attbi.com (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: 11 May 2003 14:07:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20030510203753.H665@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: doc@FreeBSD.org cc: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: docs/52041: testing new mdoc-bug class X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 21:05:10 -0000 Doug Barton writes: > Those all sound good to me, my big concern was that if your intention was > a category that covered all docs in src that the name reflect that. :) I guess the division could have been "mdoc-bug" vs. "sgml-bug" or "src-doc-bug" vs. "doc-doc-bug" but the two divisions are probably about the same thing, in practice. I suspect that many people don't want to mess with certain source languages (oh, say FDP's SGML) and would like to choose their PRs by language. (Maybe that should be another field in the next PR system.) In this case, most PR searchers, being fluent in both languages, would probably find the src/doc division more useful. People searching for a certain class of PRs should remember to also look for the class "change-request", which conflicts with with other class elements and so might apply to "src-doc" and "doc-doc" files. :(