From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 31 22:31:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE0C16A420; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3855743D6D; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:31:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.10.3.185] ([69.15.205.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2VMV4jN018655; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:31:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <442DADA0.3080804@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:30:56 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maksim Yevmenkin References: <200603311903.k2VJ3cjw004899@repoman.freebsd.org> <442D93D6.7010401@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 22:31:13 -0000 Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > On 3/31/06, Scott Long wrote: > >>Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: >> >>>emax 2006-03-31 19:03:37 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD src repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> sys/i386/conf GENERIC >>> Log: >>> Add kbdmux(4) to GENERIC >>> >>> Requested by: scottl >>> >>> Revision Changes Path >>> 1.440 +2 -0 src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC >> >>This should definitely be added to amd64, and maybe sparc64 also. > > > well, i have no objections to this, but i do not have spare non-i386 > hardware to try kbdmux out myself at the moment. if someone could > please try it and see if it works then i will add kbdmux to other > supported arch's. > > thanks, > max I just tested with amd64. i386 and amd64 are the important ones since it seems to be machines like Dell servers that are running into problems most right now. If you don't feel comfortable with the other arches, then I think it's fine to wait on them until you have confirmation. Scott