From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:07:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030AB16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:07:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (hak.cnd.mcgill.ca [132.216.11.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AC843D54 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:07:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0924F15049944; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:04:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: (from mat@localhost) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id i0924F5K049943; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:04:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:04:15 -0500 From: Mathew Kanner To: sebastian ssmoller Message-ID: <20040109020415.GQ38657@cnd.mcgill.ca> References: <1073325974.914.5.camel@tyrael.linnet> <20040108172614.GG38657@cnd.mcgill.ca> <1073588439.900.15.camel@tyrael.linnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1073588439.900.15.camel@tyrael.linnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: I speak for myself, operating in Montreal, CANADA X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on hak.cnd.mcgill.ca cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: snd_fm801 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:07:42 -0000 On Jan 08, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > hi, > i applied that patch. here is the dmesg output: > > > fm801_pci_probe device id found > fm801_pci_probe not expect controller > Well then, from the source code /* * XXX: quick check that device actually has sound capabilities. * The problem is that some cards built around FM801 chip only * have radio tuner onboard, but no sound capabilities. There * is no "official" way to quickly check this, because all * IDs are exactly the same. The only difference is 0x28 * device control register, described in FM801 specification * as "SRC/Mixer Test Control/DFC Status", but without * any more detailed explanation. According to specs, and * available sample cards (SF256-PCP-R and SF256-PCS-R) its * power-on value should be `0', while on AC97-less tuner * card (SF64-PCR) it was 0x80. */ Could you force the test to be true (right after this comment) and try it again? Thanks, --Mat -- sig machine broken