Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:38:08 +0100
From:      Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>
To:        Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Building interactive ports with poudriere
Message-ID:  <2684d9fa-9fab-74a1-fa15-1c7331b2d966@fechner.net>
In-Reply-To: <20180131.033213.1392952201427913309.yasu@utahime.org>
References:  <20180126.040456.2159285771207405632.yasu@utahime.org> <CALM2mEkaJjX1kfWoGGPnXxm4P=KvRBz5YRaaDUn0a8bdFhu3Eg@mail.gmail.com> <20180131.033213.1392952201427913309.yasu@utahime.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 30.01.2018 um 19:32 schrieb Yasuhiro KIMURA:
> I would like to build security/bruteforceblocker with poudriere. This
> port have one options. But it has nothing to do with my question. The
> source of problem is license information. There is no license
> information about this software either in source archive or on web
> site. So LICENSE is set to "NONE" in Makefile. And when LICENSE is set
> to it LICENSE_PERMS doesn't include 'auto-accept'. So if you build it
> on real environment dialog for confirmation is popped up. But if you
> set 'BATCH=yes' then build fails as following.
>
> yasu@maybe[2366]% pwd
> /usr/ports/security/bruteforceblocker
> yasu@maybe[2367]% make BATCH=yes
> ===>  bruteforceblocker-1.2.4 License NONE needs confirmation, but BATCH is
> defined.
> *** Error code 1
have you tried: DISABLE_LICENSES=yes

Gruß
Matthias

-- 

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." --
Rich Cook




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2684d9fa-9fab-74a1-fa15-1c7331b2d966>