Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 15:32:15 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __sF Message-ID: <20021102233215.GA30122@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021102181431.H35807-100000@sasami.jurai.net> References: <200211021906.gA2J6ld0072679@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20021102181431.H35807-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 06:15:09PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, Mark Murray wrote: > > This shouldn't be a problem. The commercial software Should Not Be(tm) > > supporting something as variable as CURRENT, and with the STABLE libraries > > around in COMPAT mode, the compiler Will Just Work(tm) (or should with > > not much effort). > > > > By the time __sF is mainstream, I guess the vendor will have adapted > > their product to match. Win, win. > > This isn't the case for one piece of vendor software that I'm not allowed > to talk about. > See the new WANT_COMPAT4_STDIO make.conf knob. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021102233215.GA30122>