Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 23:04:40 -0700 From: Chris <portmaster@BSDforge.com> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>, "ports\@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap Message-ID: <01cb6d1358c3564b1f24dc631fc28498@udns.ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <24369.29082.747815.264343@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:11:06 -0400 Robert Huff roberthuff@rcn=2Ecom said > Michael Gmelin writes: >=20 > > There are many users who never create any patches, but simply use > > the ports tree to install software=2E >=20 > =09Add my name to that list=2E > =09(Used to use cvsup =2E=2E=2E now subversion =2E=2E=2E soon git =2E=2E=2E where will=20 > the insanity end? :-) ) LOL it *won't*=2E In about 6mos from now, something shinny will appear on the horizon=2E=2E=2E=2E It's a bit like a dog chasing it's tail; it never ends=2E ;-) But I don't mind=2E So long as the svn server can be kept in sync=2E >=20 >=20 > =09=09=09Respectfully, >=20 >=20 > =09=09=09=09Robert Huff >=20 >=20 --Chris >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Get it right: _physical_ distancing; _social_ cohesion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01cb6d1358c3564b1f24dc631fc28498>