From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 3 07:00:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0496116A4ED for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:00:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from frdp.freebsd.org.ua (82.193.106.18.ipnet.kiev.ua [82.193.106.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B6943D5E for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:00:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from frdp.freebsd.org.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frdp.freebsd.org.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7372SDW027765; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:02:28 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by frdp.freebsd.org.ua (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7372SLi027764; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:02:28 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:02:28 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Antony Mawer Message-ID: <20060803070228.GD87627@freebsd.org.ua> References: <44D18EAF.1010907@mawer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NtwzykIc2mflq5ck" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44D18EAF.1010907@mawer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plans to port OpenBSD trunk(4)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 07:00:35 -0000 --NtwzykIc2mflq5ck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:50:39PM +1000, Antony Mawer wrote: > Hi list, >=20 > Is there any interest or plans underway to port the trunk(4) feature=20 > from OpenBSD? OpenBSD's trunk(4) appears to be exactly what I'm looking= =20 > for, but there doesn't appear to be anything I can find on a port to=20 > FreeBSD. >=20 > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=3Dtrunk&sektion=3D4 >=20 > I've been tasked with setting up a system that will have 2x Intel=20 > Pro/1000 network adapters linked to an HP ProCurve 5300XL modular switch. >=20 > I stumbled across ng_fec(4), but it refers explicitly to Cisco Fast=20 > EtherChannel; some information suggests that this is supported by the HP= =20 > switch... would using Netgraph with ng_fec achieve the same end result?= =20 > Has anyone successfully used it as such? >=20 ng_one2many(4) can do it; search for "bonding" in the FreeBSD mail archives for details. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --NtwzykIc2mflq5ck Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE0Z+EqRfpzJluFF4RAld0AJ9mcQiyLew/1StGhO81W7KQFbeXkQCfdsAX PwQxfVRzOqEAv2k1AyAIla8= =VrUj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NtwzykIc2mflq5ck--