Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 19:11:56 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Cc: "George Neville-Neil" <gnn@neville-neil.com>, freebsd- <arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: A proposal for code removal prior to FreeBSD 13 Message-ID: <261A6437-3ECC-43FF-ADA2-EE430477BB92@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <201812161645.wBGGj7qn092076@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <201812161645.wBGGj7qn092076@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 Dec 2018, at 16:45, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: I’ll ignore the “turning FreeBSD into change-management procedures” part. > timed was removed outside of current procedure, and that should > be corrected ASAP, No, it should not. There is a stable branch, with shipping releases, and support until at least June 30, 2020, possibly longer. The questions are: (a) will the request still be relevant then? (b) do we still want to support it then? (c) with pkgbase hopefully coming, will it still matter or is it better off to be “3rd party” software? (d) if it’s coming back, do we have a developer to care about it and take care of the original reason that triggered the removal? > as one developer has already spoken up that > they are using it. s/developer/user/ ; whether he is a developer as well is not the point. /bz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?261A6437-3ECC-43FF-ADA2-EE430477BB92>