Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:27:38 -0500
From:      David DeSimone <fox@verio.net>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: VLANs and routing
Message-ID:  <20070615162738.GA21747@verio.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070615104329.GF1173@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
References:  <f4q05k$f68$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070615104329.GF1173@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> > But the (somewhat weird) requirements are that the vlan interface on
> > machine1 shouldn't have assigned IP address, but the second one
> > should.
> [...]
> > Is this kind of setup even supported?
> 
> I don't see how it could be if machine1 is an IP endpoint:  In order
> to transmit a packet, it needs to put a source IP address into the
> packet - which virtually always comes from the interface.

When originating a packet, that is the case.  But a forwarded packet
already has a source address, which can be left unchanged.  As long as
routing is working (ARP is not needed, destination is clear, etc), the
intermediate interface need not have an IP.

- -- 
David DeSimone == Network Admin == fox@verio.net
  "It took me fifteen years to discover that I had no
   talent for writing, but I couldn't give it up because
   by that time I was too famous.  -- Robert Benchley
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGcr36FSrKRjX5eCoRAnnwAJ4l/TIJPiMsNULHhAoJi6q12Y/vygCggBEe
k47dQu/ZHnKNEPTaE9aW4lQ=
=pg4w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070615162738.GA21747>