From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 1 00:55:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB103C4 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 00:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13B431C25 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2014 00:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-24-8-230-52.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.230.52] helo=damnhippie.dyndns.org) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WJYCl-0003Sf-Mx for freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:55:03 +0000 Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s210t0VB042731 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:55:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 24.8.230.52 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+9aYMB25olVPtxmNUVG2fr Subject: clang 3.4 and u-boot From: Ian Lepore To: freebsd-arm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:55:00 -0700 Message-ID: <1393635300.1149.205.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:55:11 -0000 I just noticed this in 'cc --help' output for clang 3.4: -ffixed-r9 Reserve the r9 register (ARM only) Does that mean we can now build u-boot with clang and not need to build a recent gcc from ports? I don't have time to experiment with it right now, but that might shave some time off a crochet build. -- Ian