From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 23:11:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF2116A511 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD5B44654 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:41:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045FE1A3C1A; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B210515B2; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:41:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:41:54 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Russell E. Meek" Message-ID: <20051124204154.GA30073@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org> <43854C94.6040206@russellmeek.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43854C94.6040206@russellmeek.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 23:11:31 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:16:04AM -0500, Russell E. Meek wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote: > >=20 > > > >>Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server=20 > >>enviroment, production or non? > >> > >>Pros? Cons? > >> =20 > >> > > > >This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well > >to research the answer before asking :)=20 > > > >It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines > >with many CPUs (e.g. 12). > > > >Kris > >=20 > > > Kris, >=20 > This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well > to research the answer before asking :)=20 >=20 > Shitty remark, not wise to jump to conclusions. >=20 >=20 > Common Sense would dictate that it would be highly retarded for me to=20 > ask a question that I have not at least ever so slightly attempted to=20 > look into. Since when has common sense ever been a guide to human behaviour? :-) Sorry for being snippy, it's just that I've answered this question about 24 times in public. Kris --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhiWRWry0BWjoQKURAjF7AJ0aSf2jPEMTIMMHx87zvdDCpfe6cgCbBJOo 3Wjx7tNVO3v5F+97vSRfBzo= =lRbh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--