From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 15:23:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B200106564A for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.lavoie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9841D8FC0C for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgm6 with SMTP id gm6so792311lbb.13 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:23:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=A9sz/8INyHYDHoSmP6PgDnILqomnsGK76SgPTiE8lzg=; b=wea1Nkvu9jcJcvMy41S5EhqDFuKhd2ifoQ6MoNNtBgRMHUicGHAjdsiwiNW3SPjDiO 6kEyCorvzTzdLk6dYksqVBOsziuYBSKkTbJZKofaK6OIwV9GtOFLfmN3M4pso1Sqi9+x ckRkXpTabAtzSJokPb5rjnxLK4hV86Bf7lq9SXTNgX6qmWpqYe892hnzLg3OgCOzCde1 PKEHWTIy1+TLpzWB+UFpq6Hg3Kdw0nLeCBI9+O5pf5QMH9R/pBFz8B3VCmrX4YPN4REP IhaHiziZKF+vQA9DW4fY0a8VuJpN0RrP++++Ke2DQG/IkBHkOudjuVpC04wsHPM9H+tf hz4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.112.97 with SMTP id ip1mr10955417lab.31.1335540221062; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.66.47 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:23:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4F966F2D.1070709@gmx.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:23:41 -0400 Message-ID: From: Christian Lavoie To: Nikos Vassiliadis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/165252 patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:23:43 -0000 Interestingly, both this and the other patch fail to prevent the whole thing from dying when running "/etc/rc.d/jail stop" (individually or not). I should be able to get a backtrace and more useful info out of ddb early next week -- anything in particular that could help? On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Christian Lavoie wrote: > So far, boots and seems to be working (1 hour and counting). I'll try > to load up the machine some next week and stress test this. > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: >> On 4/23/2012 6:33 PM, Christian Lavoie wrote: >>> >>> The patch mentioned at >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165252&cat=kern#reply1 is >>> working for me -- without the patch my FreeBSD machine crashes within >>> a minute or two of booting, and with it it's been up for about half a >>> day now, under non-trivial networking load. >>> >>> I've contacted the author directly, and he asked that I mention here >>> that the patch is working for me, and ask that it be reviewed. Can >>> someone review said patch? >>> >>> I'm running 9.0-RELEASE, running two jails created following the >>> vimage/vnet howto at >>> >>> http://wiki.polymorf.fr/index.php/Howto:FreeBSD_jail_vnet#Advenced_networking_:_NAT_and_firewalling >>> >> >> Hi Christian, >> >> You may want to try this better version of the patch. >> >> Warning: it's untested, I can't test it at moment in my FreeBSD-10, >> because pf panics in several places. I believe it should apply cleanly >> to FreeBSD-9.0. >> >> Nikos > > > > -- > Have fun, Christian > http://linkedin.christianlavoie.net > > "I won't let you fall apart." -- Have fun, Christian http://linkedin.christianlavoie.net "I won't let you fall apart."