From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 5 22:09:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C97CDAA2; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 22:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A48E42374; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 22:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tuna.dhcp.nue.suse.com (nat.nue.novell.com [195.135.221.2]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 781543F40F; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 18:09:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 00:09:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Antoine Brodin Subject: Re: Error: Orphaned: @unexec rmdir "/home" >/dev/null 2>&1 || : (PING) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 22:09:18 -0000 On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>> It's LOCALBASE that points to /home/gerald/10-i386, so I am really >>> puzzled about those @unexec rmdir's that want to remove my LOCALBASE. >> You can try attached patch. > Cool. That fixes the issue in my tests. Thinking a bit more about this: Doesn't this just silence the diagnostics, while "something" still adds those entries to the package that trie to remove the parent directories of LOCALBASE? That is, shouldn't those @unexec rmdir's not be added beyond ("higher") than LOCALBASE? Gerald