Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:13:54 -0400 From: "Naram Qashat" <cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com> To: <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/99556: editors/scite fails complaining about lua Message-ID: <025001c69aef$61cfafe0$fe02a8c0@metroid> References: <200606271718.k5RHIH1W002164@freefall.freebsd.org> <020201c69a38$bbe6d0b0$fe02a8c0@metroid> <1151480656.93043.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <023401c69ab8$495ba2c0$fe02a8c0@metroid> <1151507143.93043.23.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What really doesn't make sense about this is that I know that gcc usually looks for functions in reverse order, so if all the object files after LuaExtensions.o have the functions that LuaExtensions.o is looking for, why would gcc complain and say it can't find those functions? I checked and those functions are defined in those other Lua object files given. Plus I know SciTE has been able to compile under FreeBSD 6.1 before, because I did recompile it some time after upgrading to 6.1. Naram Qashat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pav Lucistnik" <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: "Naram Qashat" <cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com> Cc: <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:05 AM Subject: Re: ports/99556: editors/scite fails complaining about lua
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?025001c69aef$61cfafe0$fe02a8c0>