From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 14 14: 1:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from paert.tse-online.de (paert.tse-online.de [194.97.69.172]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E62A158D0 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:01:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ab@paert.tse-online.de) Received: (qmail 19922 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Apr 1999 21:01:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 23:01:24 +0200 From: Andreas Braukmann To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT4 server 2.5 times faster than Linux Message-ID: <19990414230124.F12303@paert.tse-online.de> References: <3714EFA7.239DEBF5@chen.ml.org> <19990414155546.A753@erols.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <19990414155546.A753@erols.com>; from Lee Cremeans on Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 03:55:46PM -0400 Organization: TSE TeleService GmbH Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 03:55:46PM -0400, Lee Cremeans wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 03:42:31PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote: > > http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html > It should be noted, right now, that this test wasn't fair at all. They I have to second this ... > report between March 10 and March 13, 1999. Microsoft Corporation > sponsored the testing reported herein. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > That should speak volumes about the test's credibility. yes. I would recommend following the performance-related links on the samba website. http://www.samba.org or http://us1.samba.org -andreas -- : PGP-Key: http://www.tse-online.de/~ab/public-key : : Key fingerprint: 12 13 EF BC 22 DD F4 B6 3C 25 C9 06 DC D3 45 9B : To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message