Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:33:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 263982] IPv6 Router Advertisement - Route Information Option Message-ID: <bug-263982-7501-vjN2Rdaj5r@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-263982-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-263982-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263982 David T <dxdt@dev.snart.me> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dxdt@dev.snart.me --- Comment #4 from David T <dxdt@dev.snart.me> --- So I wrote this: https://github.com/dxdxdt/gists/blob/master/writeups/ipv6/rfc4191/rfc4191.md RIO is a quite recent invention in Apple products as well. Neat thing to ha= ve, if you ask me. Hopefully, I'll get to update the table soon. I find it so funny how pfSense is using RIO to push default route, but rtso= ld can't use it! lol Having said that, many legacy devices might have trouble parsing it, too. I= t's not enabled in Linux kernel by default either, so some embedded systems will have the same issue. I for one think that pfSense is in the wrong, not rtso= ld. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-263982-7501-vjN2Rdaj5r>