Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 18:59:21 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org>, bf1783@gmail.com, Grzegorz Blach <magik@roorback.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs fresh Blood! Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103061846150.99283@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <4D743539.6060101@FreeBSD.org> References: <AANLkTi=d5hP-WHPQVJYk9%2B7gXd-3d5j_wgypz7QM2A6X@mail.gmail.com> <4D73D464.3070806@roorback.net> <4D7409CB.1040706@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTinwzwFhP5Dz4XpA3Y4K5p=-LVa28ep-29Uoyh_F@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinPSYT=dC%2Bqjsqnit6iWXAWN9WJwBuW0HMx10rC@mail.gmail.com> <4D743539.6060101@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/06/2011 16:40, Olivier Smedts wrote: > >> Could you use "pkg_version -vL =" for your purpose ? It's a base >> system tool and doesn't need INDEX. > > If all you want to know is what ports need updating, portmaster has an option > for that. There is also an alias to abbreviate the output in the man page. pkg_version is somewhat faster. On my system (seconds): portmaster -L | filters: 32.53 pkg_version -vl'<': 23.99 And, for a malus versus citrus comparison with hidden overhead: portversion -vl'<': 7.32
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1103061846150.99283>