Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 23:12:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237213] [NEW PORT] devel/mingw-w64 cross compilers Message-ID: <bug-237213-7788-D2ranwb29H@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237213-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237213-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237213 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gerald@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #20 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> --- As a minor detail, new ports don't carry PORTREVISION. Is there a specific reason you don't autogenerate pkg-plist like the lang/gcc* ports do? Wouldn't it be easier to have one pkg-plist, not one per architecture? Substitutions might help with that, and if there is a specific issue you ran into, perhaps I (or others) have an idea? More generally, how hard would it be to use the existing lang/gcc10 port, like you have been doing with binutils? (Note: I simply don't have the bandwidth to do a final review or commit, merely trying to help - and hoping someone will step up for the other=20 aspects.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237213-7788-D2ranwb29H>