From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 6 18:07:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE92916A4CE; Thu, 6 May 2004 18:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25BE43D2D; Thu, 6 May 2004 18:07:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp3 (b5pou3w9@mp3files.int.ru [195.128.64.20]) by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4717ru513545684; Fri, 7 May 2004 05:07:53 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 05:07:53 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Andre Oppermann In-Reply-To: <409AD3D0.DF5114F@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20040507050215.F5417@mp3files.int.ru> References: <409AD3D0.DF5114F@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: Default behaviour of IP Options processing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 01:07:58 -0000 [...] > May I propose an default setting for IP options which allows for RR but > restricts the packet size that will be acted upon and is rate limited like > many of our ICMP replies to certain other events like closed ports etc? > This would satisfy the RR tracers and make Jaques and me more happy than > we are with the current situation. Rate limit is OK. Probably the packet size restrictions is OK too. Do not think we need a special case for RR. I hope you are not going to turn off ip fragmentation/reassembling by default to make SO happy, aren't you? -- Maxim Konovalov