From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 1 16:47:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1639137B8E8; Mon, 1 May 2000 16:47:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA28681; Mon, 1 May 2000 16:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200005012343.QAA28681@implode.root.com> To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: blk@skynet.be (Brad Knowles), parag@cgt.com, msmith@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How good is AMI MegaRAID support? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 May 2000 16:00:59 PDT." <200005012300.QAA18195@freeway.dcfinc.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 16:43:10 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> How fast is fast enough? Do you need a disk subsystem that can >> handle bursts of ~2500 USENET news history database lookups per >> second? What would it take to get to that level? Do you need to see >> rawio read performance (average tranfer size of one sector w/ 64 >> simultaneous processes) of around 5,000 read operations per second? > >We're running quite a bit more than 5,000 iops/sec on the EMC Symmetrix >box that's replacing the A-3500s. > >Just depends on what it is you need done. TeraSolutions' RAID systems (TSR-2200) as used on ftp.freesoftware.com are capable of >9,000 IOPS. There are other issues to consider when thinking about software RAID-5. The most important of these is the (lack of) non-volatile write-back cache. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message