Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:59:39 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: dima@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Question about pilot-link port Message-ID: <20011221125939.M73815@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <3C232B78.FC903DDF@FreeBSD.org> References: <3C232B78.FC903DDF@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:30:48PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Is there a reason why the pilot-link maintained by you installs its
> files into ${PREFIX}/pilot, but not into ${PREFIX} directly? This
> complicates usage of this port in dependent ports, as well as requires
> from a user to tweak his PATH in order to use binaries installed by
> it. Not even to mention that its pkg-plist should be extended to
> automatically run ldconfig after installation in the case when its
> installed via a pre-built package.
>
> What do you think about converting it to use more common prefix
> settings?
I rewrote it a few weeks ago to respect PREFIX; however, I also
had this question but decided to leave it up to the maintainer.
I also think it should be installed in PREFIX directly.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011221125939.M73815>