Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:16:42 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating Claws-Mail Message-ID: <20101214101642.00007c8c@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4D067272.2040404@FreeBSD.org> References: <20101211070156.414b5760@seibercom.net> <AANLkTikmh9XaQPxYnG8hGw9jX-3tOx0e_LYhef3pHEAD@mail.gmail.com> <20101211212624.0000067c@unknown> <20101212215431.2b2948ba@o2.pl> <20101212232351.70e145a7@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20101213103125.00002af7@unknown> <20101213151239.79528759@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20101213170628.0000695f@unknown> <4D067272.2040404@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:22:26 -0800 Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On 12/13/2010 08:06, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > What's wrong with having it build on the pointyhat cluster for those > > which build a package and to make it an option for those which build > > the port? > > I think some ports have split the docs into their own port, e.g., > gimp. Is that a reasonable approach here? It depends on how much time you want to spend to seperate the docs build from the source build respectively to write some FreeBSD Makefile-Fu to run configure and just build and install the docs. Making the manual build (and corresponding build depends) optional is easy. Bye, Alexander.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101214101642.00007c8c>