Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:02:02 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen <jonathan.chen@itouch.co.nz> To: xuyifeng <xyf@stocke.com> Cc: Kristopher Borodiansky <elit@home.com>, Wouter Van Hemel <wouter@fort-knox.rave.org.stocke.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, wvhemel@vub.ac.be Subject: Re: Apache - lynx Message-ID: <20001208140202.B4694@jonc.itouch> In-Reply-To: <003b01c060b1$7189ad60$5ac809c0@xyf>; from xyf@stocke.com on Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 08:54:15AM %2B0800 References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012071629350.25464-100000@fort-knox.rave.org> <3A2FE890.C01CB711@home.com> <003b01c060b1$7189ad60$5ac809c0@xyf>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 08:54:15AM +0800, xuyifeng wrote:
> does this mean FreeBSD is not advised to use Apache and Lynx?
> I have found other http server packages I have never seen before in the distribution,
> they are worthlesss, but were included, so it's very strange.
> the FreeBSD release engineer must made mistakes, Apache and Lynx should be included,
> they should throw those garbage packages away, but I don't know why.
The apache build from the ports work fine. They usually always do. If you
need the latest version of the ports, cvsupdate it.
--
Jonathan Chen <jonathan.chen@itouch.co.nz>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Experience is a hard teacher
because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001208140202.B4694>