Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Nov 2006 00:41:25 +0100
From:      "Juan Rodriguez" <juan.fco.rodriguez@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [patch] rm can have undesired side-effects
Message-ID:  <96b30c400611081541y1cc870d5n4590f1d35a24fa59@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200611061610.kA6GAHrM092749@lurza.secnetix.de>
References:  <20061105052832.68400a56@loki.starkstrom.lan> <200611061610.kA6GAHrM092749@lurza.secnetix.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mac OS X uses the FreeBSD's behaviour.

I don't see any problem with the current implementation
of "rm -P".  I think I agree with Mike Meyers (omg!)

My 0.01 cents

-- 
JFRH



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96b30c400611081541y1cc870d5n4590f1d35a24fa59>