Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 01 Dec 2024 12:55:32 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 280562] [exp-run] Against llvm-19-update branch on GitHub
Message-ID:  <bug-280562-7788-d4FxQGFc2b@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-280562-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-280562-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280562

--- Comment #164 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org ---
A commit in branch stable/13 references this bug:

URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3D44be5a00bedd95e39d20f7dc6d5458251=
af49e20

commit 44be5a00bedd95e39d20f7dc6d5458251af49e20
Author:     Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2024-10-24 09:53:19 +0000
Commit:     Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2024-12-01 12:32:46 +0000

    Adjust LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS depending on NDEBUG

    When assertions are disabled, the upstream build system disables
    LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS by default. Though the upstream build
    system allows it to be force-enabled, it looks like that is not a
    well-tested build-time configuration.

    Therefore, always disable LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS when
    assertions are disabled, which will also save some more runtime cost
    when people use WITHOUT_LLVM_ASSERTIONS.

    PR:             280562
    MFC after:      1 month

    (cherry picked from commit 1c83996beda7b6a382857c318f46daefcb6bd84c)

 lib/clang/include/llvm/Config/abi-breaking.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280562-7788-d4FxQGFc2b>