From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 11:48:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C52316A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:48:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F4A43D5A for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:48:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robbak@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so940083wri for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:48:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=hdO86YCSuiuj4SnX00oOHdxRt2kFjDNY/Y6XD5wgud+brkiVPR6UMEKFXEhyjCZwiTHL4qJ6wWHm0jBGsaTaa4mag7erjI7ypOE1D8GQ+bCZ5FBTW7/uHvtlJtE0lLuCUGwciBRDzBFoftz9qTpU5MxhpbT+oXmcxqtoH3EPiuM= Received: by 10.54.11.31 with SMTP id 31mr340578wrk; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:48:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.14.13 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:48:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:48:24 +1000 From: Robert Backhaus To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= In-Reply-To: <4240015A.2020802@DeepCore.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <42028F29.1030801@DeepCore.dk> <420A1792.900@DeepCore.dk> <421464C3.2030308@DeepCore.dk> <4240015A.2020802@DeepCore.dk> cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: UPDATE3: ATA mkIII official patches - please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Robert Backhaus List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:48:25 -0000 On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:28:26 +0100, S=F8ren Schmidt wrote= : > New version available for testing: Could you tell us whether atapicam is working with your patches? Many of us require that for gui cd authorers - I'd consider it essential before it is merged... IF not, your 'academic' atacam might be a replacement, although it means I'd have to be more careful how I allow lusers to access /dev/passN and /dev/xptN....