From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 26 08:33:16 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 6EEC11065677; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:33:16 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:33:16 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
Message-ID: <20111226083316.GB68567@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201112252311.pBPNBnQQ074641@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4EF822D5.3080009@yandex.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4EF822D5.3080009@yandex.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 08:33:16 -0000

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:31:33AM +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Mark Linimon wrote on 26.12.2011 03:11:
> >   
> >   This badly-named port is not being propogated through our csup/cvsup
> >   machinery, and until this is fixed, various tools will be broken on
> >   various people's systems.
> >   
> >   Hat:            portmgr
> >   
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.4772    +1 -1      ports/devel/Makefile
> 
> Hmm, i thought that this rule applies only to files, not to
> directories.. So would you please repocopy it to, say, py-kss-core?

It always suprised me how could people come up with dot-containing port
names in the first place...  Not to mention that this `.core' issue had
bitten us already in the past.

./danfe