From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 10:29:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2496316A41C; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:29:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from mail.yazzy.org (mail.yazzy.org [217.8.140.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D711743D48; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:29:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@yazzy.org) Received: from 217-13-2-82.dd.nextgentel.com ([217.13.2.82] helo=h311r4z3r) by mail.yazzy.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (YazzY.org) id 1DlOxy-0004uO-VR; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:29:53 +0200 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:29:46 +0200 From: Marcin Jessa To: jeffm@frob.org Message-Id: <20050623122946.72bb97a5.lists@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <27188.130.76.32.15.1118844489.squirrel@www.frob.org> References: <58397.148.122.180.9.1118829978.squirrel@mail.yazzy.org> <79722fad05061505141b3ddb4c@mail.gmail.com> <27188.130.76.32.15.1118844489.squirrel@www.frob.org> Organization: YazzY.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, NetBSD-current , FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: Looking for networking solution. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:29:55 -0000 Hi guys. Thanks for the help and good advices. I just received source code from guys at MITRE in McLean, VA for FreeBSD and will do some testing on it. "The code is an open implementation of ISO International Standards and it's yours for the asking; there is no licensing." I was thinking, maybe someone would be interested in implementing it into FreeBSD's and/or NetBSD's source tree since the code is avaliable for both the BSD's? On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:08:09 -0400 (EDT) jeffm@frob.org wrote: > > On 6/15/05, M.Jessa wrote: > > Hi guys. > > > > I am looking for solution I could implement on a link with a huge > > latency > > > I am only familiar with split connection gateways. They totally isolate > TCP from the effects of the satellite link by using some sort of > enhanced protocol over the middle hop. The end TCPs are terminated > locally and do not see large RTTs or latency. I did some work last > year with Mitre's reference implementation of SCPS-TP, which made a > huge difference. However, splitting the TCP connection does cause > some issues.