From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 20 12: 1:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.79.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C6737BA21 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:00:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.79.115]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA25217; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:00:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA27867; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:00:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 13:00:31 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200003202000.NAA27867@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bill Fenner Cc: newton@internode.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WaveLAN/IEEE Turbo (Silver) In-Reply-To: <200003201904.LAA01936@windsor.research.att.com> References: <200003201904.LAA01936@windsor.research.att.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >I know the WaveLAN stuff is crap > > Actually, I've had terrific luck with WaveLAN IEEE stuff on laptops > for the last year or so. I'm not sure what's so bad about it?... Agreed. WaveLAN hardware is good stuff. We deployed 200+ users in a network, and aside from the normal problems associated with wireless communications, it worked quite well. Highly recommended... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message