From owner-freebsd-smp  Fri Jul 23 21:43:56 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.9])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BF4F614FA6; Fri, 23 Jul 1999 21:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA14734;
	Sat, 24 Jul 1999 14:43:09 +1000
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 1999 14:43:09 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199907240443.OAA14734@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG,
	sthaug@nethelp.no
Subject: Re: rndcontrol and SMP
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>        /*
>         * XXX the data is 16-bit due to a historical botch, so we use
>         * magic 16's instead of ICU_LEN and can't support 24 interrupts
>         * under SMP.
>         */
>        intr = *(int16_t *)data;
>        if (cmd != MEM_RETURNIRQ && (intr < 0 || intr >= 16))
>                return (EINVAL);
>
>What is needed to make this support a more sensible number of IRQs?

Mainly changing the ioctl and its clients (rndcontrol only?) to supply
more bits.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message