Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:37:18 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: Razmig K <strontium90@gmail.com>, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW with user-ppp's NAT Message-ID: <20080316163701.B14645@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1080316193840.4307A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1080316193840.4307A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Frankly I'm a bit surprised that this hasn't been more widely heralded, > as userland natd is often given as a reason to prefer other firewalls, what's wrong in userland natd?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080316163701.B14645>