From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  1 20:54:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEE437B401
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 May 2003 20:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bitblocks.com (bitblocks.com [209.204.185.216])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B776143F85
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 May 2003 20:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com)
Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bitblocks.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h423sMPF063284;
	Thu, 1 May 2003 20:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com)
Message-Id: <200305020354.h423sMPF063284@bitblocks.com>
To: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>,
	Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.dyndns.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 May 2003 00:45:53 +0200."
             <20030501224552.GA91998@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> 
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:54:22 -0700
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: incorrect enum warning? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 03:54:30 -0000

> Your nitpicking is wrong.

Yes, indeed.  I should have checked the standard instead of
relying on my faulty memory.  Thanks for a gentle correction
and apologies for misleading anyone.