Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:11:16 +0200 From: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: kde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can not compile KDE ... dependency on a broken port Message-ID: <200402061611.16529.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <40239C38.10207@veldy.net> References: <40239C38.10207@veldy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 06 February 2004 15:52, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > >> Checksum OK for KDE/koffice/koffice-1.3.tar.bz2. [snip] > Verifying install for fpx.1 in As you say, it's a broken dependency (of a dependency actually), so I think the mention of KDE in the subject is a bit bogus... However, I find it weird that it's marked as broken for 5.2+, since I've just successfully built it on a clean 5.2R system without a problem. Time to look at the bento logs, I guess... Hmmm, from the log: http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/libfpx-1.2.0.9.log it seems really weird. In my opinion the version check for BROKEN is wrong though, as it builds on two different 5.2R boxes for me without problems. One is virginal, the other has seen some ports abuse. A. -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402061611.16529.andy>