From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 28 07:17:30 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649EE672;
 Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:17:30 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22a.google.com (mail-ea0-x22a.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22a])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DEE0144;
 Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:17:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ea0-f170.google.com with SMTP id a15so3697879eae.15
 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
 :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=KcmKTCcAzgq9u2w8+sbUQZoVLFSXWg9DkzxmO5V22a4=;
 b=IaBz7Zkw++sJimL0ahuUpQPHgW/k+RSBYn5WDGz3C2zKwfHbnhZ9lORWGd6Gg9hZcG
 L1LeLfrNwEjlfF5x8nhZJsbddI5MLBUvfOmzvErRKtZUxw54iHNtYR3zEgaMHMuc9hgO
 JUZI5UOG3MASuPdRCe8EM2gq3jHBjS8rw71mWeMPrLqaecIBKmdvKVaIxhlE4OKqtdZi
 9wypwLZ1gr7aWRGkXnsynv9HXTAsvF03UjpRbe0F09Tcq4VMWRU7teJm+x2HJYs1K6v+
 3ym0zEl1NTYTygeMUevR1bdRFrHg2jN9xUrvCZ2QeR3FtqYaaoT5y62d3Nw/O2pvboeY
 +x1A==
X-Received: by 10.14.183.198 with SMTP id q46mr55684955eem.1.1364455048826;
 Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua (mavhome.mavhome.dp.ua. [213.227.240.37])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
 bc1sm24376334eeb.11.2013.03.28.00.17.27
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Alexander Motin <mavbsd@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5153EE86.8000801@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:17:26 +0200
From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130326 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack?
References: <51536306.5030907@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAJ-Vmon-8FaLa-=F=Z3dL85FPoRr+p3kt+tr1fo7AkOV9hhyCA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon-8FaLa-=F=Z3dL85FPoRr+p3kt+tr1fo7AkOV9hhyCA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:17:30 -0000

On 28.03.2013 02:43, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's
> reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code.
>
> It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes
> embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful.

Are there many boards now with ATA, but without USB? But I agree, it 
should be checked.

-- 
Alexander Motin