From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 2 05:00:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5774F106566C for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 05:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail1.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:201:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002A18FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 05:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o624xqZ3004139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:59:52 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 9561B1CC0D; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:59:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Chris Stankevitz In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:24:16 PDT." <656629.2878.qm@web52903.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:59:52 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20100702045952.9561B1CC0D@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-07-01_03:2010-02-06, 2010-07-01, 2010-07-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-1005130000 definitions=main-1007010186 Cc: freebsd-gnome Subject: Re: Is there something wrong with the default dbus policy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:00:02 -0000 > Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 19:24:16 -0700 (PDT) > From: Chris Stankevitz > Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org > > --- On Thu, 7/1/10, Bear wrote: > > In my system,no crash. Only the dbus policy deny the > > message of the gnome-session or maybe more processes. > > Is there any solutions? thx! > > The problem is completely repeatable with the steps I posted earlier. I reinstalled FreeBSD again, but this time I am installing everything using ports, not packages. This post leads me to believe my new strategy has a chance: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/2010-June/024394.html > > I will report back. Sorry to have to say that of my systems had all ports re-installed after the latest gnome release and all from ports. No packages. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751