Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:06:50 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= <otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Poor performance when using urtwn on beaglebone black Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=UZGqc9OntKgxf8A%2Bti8Kwmbr7Y5dsaqmUgvNPAVA7Kg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8751579c-68ae-7330-eb9b-c67d84ae18db@bsd.com.br> References: <8751579c-68ae-7330-eb9b-c67d84ae18db@bsd.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
which urtwn is it? can you do a dmesg | grep urtwn? I'd like to see which NIC it is and whether firmware rate control is workin= g. Thanks, -adrian On 22 June 2016 at 10:52, Otac=C3=ADlio <otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br> wrote: > Dears > > I'm getting poor performance when using wifi by urtwn on beaglebone black= . > I'm using netperf to do benchmarks and I'm getting less than 1Mbps normal= ly > and between 3Mbps and 7.5Mbps when creating the interface with -ht option= . I > think that previous versions has better performance. > > FreeBSD beaglebone 11.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 11.0-ALPHA4 #0 r302064: Wed Jun 22 > 00:25:52 BRT 2016 > ota@squitch:/root/workdir/crochet/work/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/BEAGLEBO= NE > arm > > []'s > > -Otac=C3=ADlio > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=UZGqc9OntKgxf8A%2Bti8Kwmbr7Y5dsaqmUgvNPAVA7Kg>