From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Dec 21 10:32:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from tao.org.uk (genius.tao.org.uk [212.135.162.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5555F37B417; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:32:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100) id BD67D86; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:31:57 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:31:57 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser To: Steve Price Cc: "Sergey A. Osokin" , Ying-Chieh Liao , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/32533: new port: databases/db4 (DB v4) Message-ID: <20011221183157.B20932@tao.org.uk> References: <200112131320.fBDDKMX60644@freefall.freebsd.org> <20011213134905.GA4168@terry.dragon2.net> <20011219145101.C5338@tao.org.uk> <20011219201430.GA75055@terry.dragon2.net> <20011221012544.A13613@tao.org.uk> <20011220193432.P72144@bsd.havk.org> <20011221052650.GA2552@terry.dragon2.net> <20011221195554.A42387@freebsd.org.ru> <20011221172852.A20932@tao.org.uk> <20011221113816.U72144@bsd.havk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011221113816.U72144@bsd.havk.org>; from steve@havk.org on Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:38:16AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:38:16AM -0600, Steve Price wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 05:28:52PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > >=20 > > Portmgrs: Is it ok for ports/databases/db3 to be repocopied to > > ports/database/db4? I notice that there's also a db3-latest that > > doesn't appear to have been brought into existence by repocopying > > db3. Is this relevant to the discussion, normally I would have > > expected that db3-devel was repocopied to db4. >=20 > It is okay with me to repo-copy db3 to db4. I haven't heard anyone > on portmgr say this was a bad thing. As for the db3-latest port > I believe Sergey is going to be removing that one soon. Ok. It has been done. Joe --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjwjgB0ACgkQXVIcjOaxUBZKCwCbBCHbvIXNKLUcWG2Zul4nFwWX e0EAoOgND1gfBEJiQs3odmyei6nGPI/0 =sfMz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message