From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 25 20:39:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132A61065690 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6808FC24 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.74]) by QMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YfR51c0011c6gX85DkSNZz; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:26:22 +0000 Received: from daland.home ([24.34.211.11]) by OMTA23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id YkW61c00H0FJTGg3jkW7q8; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:30:07 +0000 Received: from algo by daland.home with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Mg2ay-000Pd1-8W; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:26:20 -0400 From: Alex Goncharov To: Ivan Radovanovic In-reply-to: <4A944370.2000306@gmail.com> (message from Ivan Radovanovic on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:02:56 +0200) References: <20090825034054.2d57e733@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <4A94325D.6070201@FreeBSD.org> <4A9436A7.2020108@gmail.com> <4A94385A.1000405@FreeBSD.org> <4A943C18.2050103@gmail.com> <4A943D06.405@FreeBSD.org> <4A944370.2000306@gmail.com> Message-Id: Sender: Alex Goncharov Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:26:20 -0400 Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, dougb@FreeBSD.org, brian@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Deprecating ps(1)s -w switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Goncharov List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:39:37 -0000 ,--- You/Ivan (Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:02:56 +0200) ----* | > Feel free to take a crack at this and send the results to the list for | > review. Improving the documentation is always a worthy goal. | > | I would do that for sure if everyone thinks this ps behavior is | something that should be kept at current state even if it could be made | better `---------------------------------------------------* Don't know how you are going to find about "everyone", but I, for one, think that modifying the established tool's behavior in the proposed manner is an utterly bad idea. Use shell aliases, functions and scripts wrapped around the primary tool to get the behavior you like -- let others stick with their established habits and wrappers. Improving the documentation would be good, OTOH. Thanks, -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net --