From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 20 8:13:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from po4.wam.umd.edu (po4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5125E14CD0 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:13:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from culverk@wam.umd.edu) Received: from rac1.wam.umd.edu (root@rac1.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.141]) by po4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA25839; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:12:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from rac1.wam.umd.edu (sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac1.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA24403; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:12:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by rac1.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24399; Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:12:51 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: rac1.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:12:50 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver To: Ben Rosengart Cc: Fritz Heinrichmeyer , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: current for production? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm inclined to agree. I have had great luck in production boxes with FreeBSD-CURRENT, but it's not reccomended to use -CURRENT for production just because sometimes things break. :-) ================================================================= | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around. | | Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 | | and student at The | AIM: AgRSkaterq | | The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction) | | College Park. | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/| ================================================================= On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Ben Rosengart wrote: > On 20 Dec 1999, Fritz Heinrichmeyer wrote: > > > as there now is almost only talk about sound and ata drivers in this > > list, would it be adviseable to use a current-snap on a server machine > > (apache,samba,ftp) without need for sound and ata drivers (box with > > aic-scsi-only drives)? > > > > The integrated gcc-2.95.2 is so handy and current does all i want on my > > private box anyway. > > I think you'd have better luck asking people what their experiences with > the software have been, rather than asking for a recommendation. No one > is likely to want to take the responsibility of recommending -current > for a production site, but they'll be happy to share their own > experiences and let you come to your own conclusion. > > -- > Ben Rosengart > > UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group > StarMedia Network, Inc. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message