Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:24:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Mikhail Zakharov <zmey20000@yahoo.com> To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage architecture contept Message-ID: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <609769253.4003715.1461843323413.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <609769253.4003715.1461843323413.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is the second paper on the subject. Now we will try to add ZFS to our system. See the result.
On Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:40 PM, Mikhail Zakharov via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote:
Sharing my exploration on FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage architecture contept. Free to discuss and test.
The BeaST
| |
| | | | | | | |
| The BeaSTThe BeaST is the FreeBSD based dual-controller reliable storage system concept with aim to implement ZFS and in-memory cache. FreeBSD based dual-controller storage ... |
| |
| Просмотреть на mezzantrop... | Предварительный просмотр с помощью Yahoo |
| |
| |
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:31:34 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FEFB2D798
for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
Wed, 4 May 2016 08:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com)
Received: from nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
(nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.154])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE030104E
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:31:33 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048;
t62350487; bh=MGdxf37+hRdwOsSGbmup04s1H6fdxe/ZYzZ+GGBdj0c=;
hte:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject;
b=jhn0ukHAI8BpnWiFhOu22YbP9V8JkMgiKJQ/OpnjDVQ5OIOt9y5QRUYHg8cJuKuMn1nKwHmrBxBn39B6ke7CP9c1OZ3Z2LS0a+xOVXQl8pZa/yqcty6z8T7g5xuxklhyEs+HzfX0HiKO1xTtVCC4cla6EkwPScF+SaTKQ9fRatt/mjGBjyIqmA0wE8ZPnyppfUnA8CRxbKI7GDbTjLtm+XtkbBRfoSK6rYEci8Z/458MsE/rGoyQzF8Hb3ntkSvV5xMh6OqEU9vplr22xcAPiSJnoihCCiE86ALKnqHcBFsRveNtG3Xk+ny44CuGCD6CQkGSUFQq1nU6ptBNQzq2Jw=Received: from [98.139.215.143] by nm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.246] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1055.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 52507.51039.bm@omp1055.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: PgVE.ZsVM1kdtkE7H5aPOngIpvrYGvpAWhXHlQqRfASAYzaQU8pyLalOLsb.ZJi
Oz4kKXjABJysvEeOMC9CIPUYj7pdnhUieQ5aiA57elHxZ5WZbjbR8c4u.2yEhIIlGkB07cvO_n1X
UerINg6kguCBMrQx7Q.xOLdGHTEp7MZqEgXXeg70W8ijOJL6g6yslnnesY1MyzOcBk8ZKXY8z0.O
fe3LJzwWES.VM4ey3iCEFFkQCx3GDI3YTVtI3SfWRk2NQotLoDyi6SezMMb4CjYkc9HeLgfrDJUh
mhzwniPeyryWhASGAvxzuQ5aqebQIeeZkd5GLI6z43z_eex3huxvgeFe7JQrIML76s2u0KSHnP.T
UifPqXi6Wieb9Xlj6MunHUxVxN_XjyNcYvxvZZRmwrQQ9wXdMk2n24rd6FrDJXfw.f8C4A1bV0zz
nKXkz.S76sMPaDfZc9xSXcGNzsb5_mdM4Wqu88ihRyv4XY8VlJFxzPgTGXBQ4P.EGeIph2BYXw1a
_FmsHwsgoPQ--
Received: from jws10630.mail.bf1.yahoo.com by sendmailws118.mail.bf1.yahoo.com;
Wed, 04 May 2016 08:28:06 +0000; 1462350486.602
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:28:06 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mikhail Zakharov <zmey20000@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Mikhail Zakharov <zmey20000@yahoo.com>
To: Mikhail Zakharov <zmey20000@yahoo.com>,
FreeBSD Questions Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <945717021.7460074.1462350486345.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage architecture contept
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:31:34 -0000
Beautiful. I have lost the link once again. https://mezzantrop.wordpress.com/2016/05/04/adding-zfs-to-the-freebsd-dual-controller-storage-concept/
On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 10:24 AM, Mikhail Zakharov via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote:
This is the second paper on the subject. Now we will try to add ZFS to our system. See the result.
On Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:40 PM, Mikhail Zakharov via freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote:
Sharing my exploration on FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage architecture contept. Free to discuss and test.
The BeaST
| |
| | | | | | | |
| The BeaSTThe BeaST is the FreeBSD based dual-controller reliable storage system concept with aim to implement ZFS and in-memory cache. FreeBSD based dual-controller storage ... |
| |
| Просмотреть на mezzantrop... | Предварительный просмотр с помощью Yahoo |
| |
| |
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:34:09 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FCAB2D890
for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
Wed, 4 May 2016 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 089E312A4
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e201so177344862wme.0
for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 04 May 2016 01:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s 120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc; bh5x0MnjwrJxD7XHBJSNTmmIGi0fkYJxrmWjmFQ4aVo=;
b=DQP8Vh5zBNKfXDrT6WtlV/5cQH9F0aypeox1WdHqFHbfu/VlAx7pgv53PXr7a7b3is
BPANzR3AERPkQnPdSYhtwPpO61ClpC4IGG6dMSkYgnNH3Tiel7cQLz6JXMeO7rep/mj7
uQAhOpF8xgFdaRsddY9f1lQ23FOnTT0bOwsC4nZCwIOCZ5DSJYkZaSbDWvm/+N/Ar+9h
2s0RU8jvXtPCcdF2HzM+3FBEvRomYDMwQrzBDtBg1rhOzckk4uxGAKwywSKQvQhq0+Bu
wA7ocH9ehP7KmFMr8EGng8padYZquryaEG5HctgmMjMVx8kDRzG1EjD8b9cwzMGBgIyX
hNig=X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d 100.net; s 130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
bh5x0MnjwrJxD7XHBJSNTmmIGi0fkYJxrmWjmFQ4aVo=;
b=ksSqal2F3krTq1a73EyyNYLCXqxcCi4j8B5rNWP8QmWiLQGu6KZkGf8dddTAg/jel+
O2zCUtcF6MOlbdqkj+Iz5m5ojZU+UOv64eUPgkpo4vwfn8eg/kiuJJFku9jN+OV+Cs5r
CfAcKwKb3t8LGuriyIlO7secD0Ncr7pQCtJNekEURM/K9ySXKPHG+30PUq9RRGR2UMxy
g6r7AwmoyeEL7cJwyNxvocHfd6Ad1s4F92wfu4MHAtLrV6Y/BgVQmXsLF4XFfcdiVmrT
IrqPdcDXizEaSMsj0/6j2aYKbG9UBTMabbs2e6CkUjPxg8UCPL59qbe0QV+/4tPl8JaV
WAGA=X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXkGddH51ZbMLaJwt2u15y6RW03Dt62aej8FC70Tbwy4reiE4fgfwJdOJIRzo2qiZT+eYIiegqiJHrSGA=MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.175.168 with SMTP id cb8mr7340297wjc.56.1462350847575;
Wed, 04 May 2016 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.26.17 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160504102012.4d57d3ca.freebsd@edvax.de>
References: <BLU436-SMTP151A41CC0BE118F82C0C189F6660@phx.gbl>
<20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de>
<5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com>
<BLU436-SMTP10004EAA9AA9F6D830DF24CF6670@phx.gbl>
<20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de>
<5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com>
<BLU436-SMTP2101D0F5AB8E190FC0ACF0F67A0@phx.gbl>
<20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de>
<BLU436-SMTP187610848C906237B9BDC97F67A0@phx.gbl>
<alpine.BSF.2.20.1605031100310.42085@wonkity.com>
<BLU437-SMTP761CBBBDFB20DD40709E22F67A0@phx.gbl>
<alpine.BSF.2.20.1605031339470.42085@wonkity.com>
<BLU436-SMTP2537154E3D857B005B43F38F67B0@phx.gbl>
<alpine.BSF.2.20.1605032009160.91466@wonkity.com>
<BLU437-SMTP102E976A9C77A921D5FC26DF67B0@phx.gbl>
<alpine.BSF.2.20.1605032303270.88850@wonkity.com>
<BLU436-SMTP1361B213CEB4F73EB0874CAF67B0@phx.gbl>
<20160504102012.4d57d3ca.freebsd@edvax.de>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:34:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CALfReye+L64gCnmFDeD2uN4FNf7A2w4qdPysX+hSCbXMvY2XcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ?
From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc: Manish Jain <bourne.identity@hotmail.com>,
FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>;
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:34:09 -0000
usually there is an option in the bios somewhere to alter the allocation of
ram to the video card. It can usually go from 64M-256M. Set it to the
lowest setting to present as much of the ram to the OS. Then run memtest
again. You may get different results.
On 4 May 2016 at 09:20, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2016 12:41:06 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
> > On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote:
> > >
> > >> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks
> > >>
> > >> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1
> > >
> > > Looks like this one:
> > > http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005
> > >
> > > Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory
> > > would be in one of the removable DIMMs.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ pick
> > up any errors in 65 passes ?
>
> As I mentioned earlier, this is a "false-negative" result. The portions
> of the RAM dedicated for the GPU are "cut away" quite eary, so memtest
> can only test what's left for "normal RAM". And those portions don't seem
> to have the error. The "GPU RAM" portions cannot be tested with memtest
> because it cannot access them: To the memtest access routine, the situation
> is as follows: Let's say there are 4 GB RAM, 1 GB dedicated for GPU, so
> for memtest there's 3 GB RAM to check. _Where_ this is located - well,
> that depends on how the system BIOS/EFI decides on where to place the
> GPU RAM segment ("internal addressing"). Let's assume you have two chips
> of 2 GB each, this _could_ be the layout:
>
> +--------------------+
> Bank 0: |VVVFVVVVVV | 2 GB
> +----------^---------+
> RAM address 00000000 here
>
> +--------------------+
> Bank 1: | | 2 GB
> +--------------------+
>
> Then memtest will check from 00000000 to the end of the 3 GB RAM, and
> the fault (F) is within the GPU RAM (V). It won't be tested.
>
> Maybe you could just swap the modules an re-run the test. However, it's
> hard to say _where_ the GPU RAM will end up, maybe at the beginning of
> bank 1? Maybe a "random choice"? Or maybe it isn't even one contiguous
> memory space?
>
>
> --
> Polytropon
> Magdeburg, Germany
> Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
> Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo>