From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:24:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91453B2D4AA for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com) Received: from nm34-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm34-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583F01DE7 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1462350269; bh=9GHptjsLGYbHCiVDD54jCnVAGLgNhXpfFP4cfYZlDrs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=AR9VMJINsFcmvF6BMF2dCcljJkF4CIV3X5K/c97GMI6lmyN1Q0l461fLP2ZHpFHkMqqOpDetevqOxmspi7dCVFaKxdJM1aQvVyhBPG8ywu4n2TF16Llx0PWFJi05ijfG8RvLjBHPLzuZJvKZbUFTKfUqzVXWS/0jII7iu4d4/DO2hSkFYPrIquik2Wrq0XvpZm46Zmmu695LA0sYW0Htf8jCR75ROL8QdpQIUP+IElbCqFUPca5YPZUoBP3jV1ZGQKnuJ7T5bGU/+3vkqLVxGfrNTgsARZryMY0NT2KahSGHePsEjjcvOEqE+uiA8sFAnqiuvMrECnvixJcQF7ZRRg== Received: from [98.139.170.180] by nm34.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:24:29 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.192] by tm23.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:24:29 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:24:29 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 926069.52840.bm@omp1001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: yExIqrYVM1lt_Khnmjn76o3kQb1sL2qCdSzejXVmckSe6Zj6sAYJm6XKvRELL98 I1hc2YvmJWpLNXwVQKR0cLBPI0d33KXkc0QOQthB39sy5m91yK3G8jMy7hapn6NEVZAVMTMi.jug emP7vw0ryFHNCR729UJQIxE4a0cWzaNDnkIRqHceYL1Ap89ogbLQk39N5MLP1HwbY31b5tVCUCc6 oAAjpEq8uRzS9hkduYcRfbu3_nR4bOaSxq3DAw334IjReZkBAKWSmBpkQE07Fp8S9xVjOsjZuWDe 8vCC38JdEq9C4Uvlbipt7.D5FlLxWeZpU9F8.9cLC1jak6suN0egppOmGkhxUldlTRpdRoELvtpS F2yj2SPq8JtiFxe46V80p124G7m05wp4kYe5soSv48bTaGtp5EDrKt7LrNGV.bQmVJgiJIFSPJtw Sp3C5dP.P9Ae8Mcwo0btZ84MjeJ21IX3CiFbVhv3sx.FQwHEsT.mgffSGDO9daTKNMTzoVXbNGK1 Kh4lAkL3xOw-- Received: from jws10666.mail.bf1.yahoo.com by sendmailws170.mail.bf1.yahoo.com; Wed, 04 May 2016 08:24:29 +0000; 1462350269.480 Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:24:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Mikhail Zakharov Reply-To: Mikhail Zakharov To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Message-ID: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <609769253.4003715.1461843323413.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <609769253.4003715.1461843323413.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage architecture contept MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:24:37 -0000 This is the second paper on the subject. Now we will try to add ZFS to our = system. See the result.=20 On Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:40 PM, Mikhail Zakharov via freebsd-quest= ions wrote: =20 Sharing my exploration on FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage archite= cture contept.=EF=BB=BF Free to discuss and test. The BeaST | =C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 |=C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | | The BeaSTThe BeaST is the FreeBSD based dual-controller reliable storage = system concept with aim to implement ZFS and in-memory cache. FreeBSD based= dual-controller storage ... | |=C2=A0 | | =D0=9F=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=82=D1=80=D0=B5=D1=82=D1=8C =D0=BD= =D0=B0 mezzantrop... | =D0=9F=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B4=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D1= =82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=BD=D1=8B=D0=B9 =D0=BF=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BC=D0= =BE=D1=82=D1=80 =D1=81 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=89=D1=8C=D1=8E Yahoo | |=C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 | _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:31:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FEFB2D798 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com) Received: from nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE030104E for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zmey20000@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1462350487; bh=MGdxf37+hRdwOsSGbmup04s1H6fdxe/ZYzZ+GGBdj0c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=jhn0ukHAI8BpnWiFhOu22YbP9V8JkMgiKJQ/OpnjDVQ5OIOt9y5QRUYHg8cJuKuMn1nKwHmrBxBn39B6ke7CP9c1OZ3Z2LS0a+xOVXQl8pZa/yqcty6z8T7g5xuxklhyEs+HzfX0HiKO1xTtVCC4cla6EkwPScF+SaTKQ9fRatt/mjGBjyIqmA0wE8ZPnyppfUnA8CRxbKI7GDbTjLtm+XtkbBRfoSK6rYEci8Z/458MsE/rGoyQzF8Hb3ntkSvV5xMh6OqEU9vplr22xcAPiSJnoihCCiE86ALKnqHcBFsRveNtG3Xk+ny44CuGCD6CQkGSUFQq1nU6ptBNQzq2Jw== Received: from [98.139.215.143] by nm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.246] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1055.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2016 08:28:07 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 52507.51039.bm@omp1055.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: PgVE.ZsVM1kdtkE7H5aPOngIpvrYGvpAWhXHlQqRfASAYzaQU8pyLalOLsb.ZJi Oz4kKXjABJysvEeOMC9CIPUYj7pdnhUieQ5aiA57elHxZ5WZbjbR8c4u.2yEhIIlGkB07cvO_n1X UerINg6kguCBMrQx7Q.xOLdGHTEp7MZqEgXXeg70W8ijOJL6g6yslnnesY1MyzOcBk8ZKXY8z0.O fe3LJzwWES.VM4ey3iCEFFkQCx3GDI3YTVtI3SfWRk2NQotLoDyi6SezMMb4CjYkc9HeLgfrDJUh mhzwniPeyryWhASGAvxzuQ5aqebQIeeZkd5GLI6z43z_eex3huxvgeFe7JQrIML76s2u0KSHnP.T UifPqXi6Wieb9Xlj6MunHUxVxN_XjyNcYvxvZZRmwrQQ9wXdMk2n24rd6FrDJXfw.f8C4A1bV0zz nKXkz.S76sMPaDfZc9xSXcGNzsb5_mdM4Wqu88ihRyv4XY8VlJFxzPgTGXBQ4P.EGeIph2BYXw1a _FmsHwsgoPQ-- Received: from jws10630.mail.bf1.yahoo.com by sendmailws118.mail.bf1.yahoo.com; Wed, 04 May 2016 08:28:06 +0000; 1462350486.602 Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:28:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Mikhail Zakharov Reply-To: Mikhail Zakharov To: Mikhail Zakharov , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Message-ID: <945717021.7460074.1462350486345.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> References: <582198723.7438364.1462350264479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage architecture contept MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:31:34 -0000 Beautiful. I have lost the link once again. https://mezzantrop.wordpress.co= m/2016/05/04/adding-zfs-to-the-freebsd-dual-controller-storage-concept/ =20 On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 10:24 AM, Mikhail Zakharov via freebsd-questi= ons wrote: =20 This is the second paper on the subject. Now we will try to add ZFS to our= system. See the result.=20 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 On Thursday, April 28, 2016 1:40 PM, Mikhail Zakharov via fre= ebsd-questions wrote: =20 Sharing my exploration on FreeBSD reliable dual-controller storage archite= cture contept.=EF=BB=BF Free to discuss and test. The BeaST | =C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 |=C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | =C2=A0 | | The BeaSTThe BeaST is the FreeBSD based dual-controller reliable storage = system concept with aim to implement ZFS and in-memory cache. FreeBSD based= dual-controller storage ... | |=C2=A0 | | =D0=9F=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=82=D1=80=D0=B5=D1=82=D1=8C =D0=BD= =D0=B0 mezzantrop... | =D0=9F=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B4=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=80=D0=B8=D1= =82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=BD=D1=8B=D0=B9 =D0=BF=D1=80=D0=BE=D1=81=D0=BC=D0= =BE=D1=82=D1=80 =D1=81 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BC=D0=BE=D1=89=D1=8C=D1=8E Yahoo | |=C2=A0 | | =C2=A0 | _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " =C2=A0=20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed May 4 08:34:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FCAB2D890 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 089E312A4 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id e201so177344862wme.0 for ; Wed, 04 May 2016 01:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Ec5x0MnjwrJxD7XHBJSNTmmIGi0fkYJxrmWjmFQ4aVo=; b=DQP8Vh5zBNKfXDrT6WtlV/5cQH9F0aypeox1WdHqFHbfu/VlAx7pgv53PXr7a7b3is BPANzR3AERPkQnPdSYhtwPpO61ClpC4IGG6dMSkYgnNH3Tiel7cQLz6JXMeO7rep/mj7 uQAhOpF8xgFdaRsddY9f1lQ23FOnTT0bOwsC4nZCwIOCZ5DSJYkZaSbDWvm/+N/Ar+9h 2s0RU8jvXtPCcdF2HzM+3FBEvRomYDMwQrzBDtBg1rhOzckk4uxGAKwywSKQvQhq0+Bu wA7ocH9ehP7KmFMr8EGng8padYZquryaEG5HctgmMjMVx8kDRzG1EjD8b9cwzMGBgIyX hNig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Ec5x0MnjwrJxD7XHBJSNTmmIGi0fkYJxrmWjmFQ4aVo=; b=ksSqal2F3krTq1a73EyyNYLCXqxcCi4j8B5rNWP8QmWiLQGu6KZkGf8dddTAg/jel+ O2zCUtcF6MOlbdqkj+Iz5m5ojZU+UOv64eUPgkpo4vwfn8eg/kiuJJFku9jN+OV+Cs5r CfAcKwKb3t8LGuriyIlO7secD0Ncr7pQCtJNekEURM/K9ySXKPHG+30PUq9RRGR2UMxy g6r7AwmoyeEL7cJwyNxvocHfd6Ad1s4F92wfu4MHAtLrV6Y/BgVQmXsLF4XFfcdiVmrT IrqPdcDXizEaSMsj0/6j2aYKbG9UBTMabbs2e6CkUjPxg8UCPL59qbe0QV+/4tPl8JaV WAGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXkGddH51ZbMLaJwt2u15y6RW03Dt62aej8FC70Tbwy4reiE4fgfwJdOJIRzo2qiZT+eYIiegqiJHrSGA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.175.168 with SMTP id cb8mr7340297wjc.56.1462350847575; Wed, 04 May 2016 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.26.17 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 01:34:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160504102012.4d57d3ca.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20160430084415.03be443d.freebsd@edvax.de> <5724604D.3020804@hotmail.com> <20160430203426.a9d5841b.freebsd@edvax.de> <5725CF38.4090007@hotmail.com> <572752E2.2040708@hotmail.com> <20160503181839.2aacad7e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160504102012.4d57d3ca.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 09:34:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is 10.3 i386 jinxed ? From: krad To: Polytropon Cc: Manish Jain , FreeBSD Questions , galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 08:34:09 -0000 usually there is an option in the bios somewhere to alter the allocation of ram to the video card. It can usually go from 64M-256M. Set it to the lowest setting to present as much of the ram to the OS. Then run memtest again. You may get different results. On 4 May 2016 at 09:20, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2016 12:41:06 +0530, Manish Jain wrote: > > On 05/04/16 10:35, Warren Block wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 May 2016, Manish Jain wrote: > > > > > >> What is printed underneath is NE56R14l-B9502G32Mnks > > >> > > >> I can't be sure whether the l is actually l or I or 1 > > > > > > Looks like this one: > > > http://in.gateway.com/gw/en/IN/content/model/NX.Y1USI.005 > > > > > > Which does not have a separate GPU, and means that the bad memory > > > would be in one of the removable DIMMs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Something to cheer about, at last. But then why does not memtest86+ pick > > up any errors in 65 passes ? > > As I mentioned earlier, this is a "false-negative" result. The portions > of the RAM dedicated for the GPU are "cut away" quite eary, so memtest > can only test what's left for "normal RAM". And those portions don't seem > to have the error. The "GPU RAM" portions cannot be tested with memtest > because it cannot access them: To the memtest access routine, the situation > is as follows: Let's say there are 4 GB RAM, 1 GB dedicated for GPU, so > for memtest there's 3 GB RAM to check. _Where_ this is located - well, > that depends on how the system BIOS/EFI decides on where to place the > GPU RAM segment ("internal addressing"). Let's assume you have two chips > of 2 GB each, this _could_ be the layout: > > +--------------------+ > Bank 0: |VVVFVVVVVV | 2 GB > +----------^---------+ > RAM address 00000000 here > > +--------------------+ > Bank 1: | | 2 GB > +--------------------+ > > Then memtest will check from 00000000 to the end of the 3 GB RAM, and > the fault (F) is within the GPU RAM (V). It won't be tested. > > Maybe you could just swap the modules an re-run the test. However, it's > hard to say _where_ the GPU RAM will end up, maybe at the beginning of > bank 1? Maybe a "random choice"? Or maybe it isn't even one contiguous > memory space? > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >