From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 19 09:34:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC42F16A41F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D3743D45 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:34:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Received: from musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de [193.175.197.95]) by alice.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jBJ9YVmF011871 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:34:32 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBJ9YNhX022376; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:34:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hank@musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de) Message-Id: <200512190934.jBJ9YNhX022376@musashi.et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de> To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: Message from Scott Long of "Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:42:51 MST." <43A26FFB.9080405@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:34:23 +0100 From: Dirk GOUDERS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My wish list for 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:34:37 -0000 > 3. Full review and update of the install docs, handbook, FAQ, etc. > There are sections that are embarrassingly out of date (one section of > the handbook apparently states that we only support a single brand of > wifi cards). A co-worker of mine tried to install 6.0 using just the > handbook install guide, and discovered that it really doesn't match > reality anymore, in both big and small ways. Contact me directly if > you would like his list of comments. I am wondering if it wouldn't be advantageous to have "versioned" documents that just cover one specific release and not to cover all realeases in single documents. I could imagine that it is harder to cover everything in single documents than to perhaps copy the existing documentation when a new branch is created and edit it to match just the new release. Maybe, I do not realize how much more work this would be but it would probably enforce regular reviews of the documentation and the readers would benefit from it. Dirk