From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 29 02:12:33 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id C7C8D1065672; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:12:33 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:12:33 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120929021233.GA74847@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201209271939.q8RJdTUs084793@svn.freebsd.org>
	<50654896.5000008@passap.ru>
	<20120928191107.GG62862@valentine.liquidneon.com>
	<5066081D.5050900@passap.ru>
	<CADLo83_xb=rqbQs=paraLVQz-jDcYrCKQvRbCgWMPyYnzOK_+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADLo83_xb=rqbQs=paraLVQz-jDcYrCKQvRbCgWMPyYnzOK_+Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
	Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>, Brad Davis <brd@freebsd.org>,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r304976 - in head/sysutils/rsyslog6: . files
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:12:33 -0000

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 09:35:10PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2012 21:27, "Boris Samorodov" <bsam@passap.ru> wrote:
> > I see. Then a line at the commit log looks reasonable to minimise a
> > possible confusion.
> 
> Perhaps you should assume that people act in good faith before accusing
> them in public of misconduct?

We should.  However, it does not hurt to make commit logs more clear.  I'm
totally on Boris' side here.

./danfe