From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 11 20:23:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822AFA22 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cforgeron@acsi.ca) Received: from AA-Edge2007.acsi.ca (unknown [IPv6:2001:0:4137:9e76:1cf2:338:71bb:44fd]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407FB1813 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AA-EX0.acsi.ca (192.168.9.11) by AA-Edge2007.acsi.ca (192.168.9.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.298.1; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:23:39 -0300 Received: from AA-EX0.acsi.ca ([::1]) by AA-EX0.acsi.ca ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:23:39 -0300 From: Chris Forgeron To: Jeremy Chadwick Subject: RE: kern/165903: mbuf leak Thread-Topic: kern/165903: mbuf leak Thread-Index: Ac4biy6IuBBGvQzdTV+HyC/2Nu0hHwa1JruAAACBygAAJAAXIA== Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:23:37 +0000 Message-ID: <46D80686C389884BB0C047851038EC456D8BE35C@AA-EX0.acsi.ca> References: <46D80686C389884BB0C047851038EC456D8BCEBC@AA-EX0.acsi.ca> <20130410235347.GA38492@icarus.home.lan> <20130411000818.GA38803@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20130411000818.GA38803@icarus.home.lan> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.9.108] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:23:40 -0000 I was already starting to load up a fresh 9.1-STABLE box for other testing,= I will also create a stock box (no changes anywhere) and let it idle for a= few days to see if the problem is still there.=20 I'll report back either way in the next few days with results.=20 If I still have problems, I will send the full diags as mentioned below. Thanks.=20 >> 1. This PR does not contain output from "dmesg" nor "pciconf -lvbc",=20 >> nor does your Email. Output from this matters. >>=20 >> 2. Please try 9.1-STABLE and see if there is an improvement; there=20 >> have been a huge number of changes/fixes to em(4) between 9.1-RELEASE=20 >> and now. You can try this: >>=20 >> https://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/amd64-amd64/9.1-RELENG_9-r249 >> 290-JPSNAP/ > >Other output that would be useful on a machine where the current mbuf coun= t is actively very high: > >* vmstat -z >* netstat -Q >* netstat -n -x > >It would also be beneficial to provide any sysctl.conf and loader.conf adj= ustments you do.