From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 09:18:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546411065676; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:18:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082538FC14; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from sunfire.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.16.80]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1KtfI4-000BoP-Dn; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:18:36 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Jeremy Chadwick In-reply-to: <20081025075543.GA55339@icarus.home.lan> References: <20081024150916.GB41283@dan.emsphone.com> <20081025075543.GA55339@icarus.home.lan> Comments: In-reply-to Jeremy Chadwick message dated "Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:55:43 -0700." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:18:36 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , Dan Nelson Subject: Re: zfs & waiting on zio->io_cv X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:18:38 -0000 [...] > > I guess this beast needs some tunning, are there any tools out there > > to monitor/tune ZFS? > > Monitor ZFS: sysctl > Tune ZFS: vi /boot/loader.conf or sysctl > > I'm not sure what you're looking for. :-) the magic wand :-) /OT there's an old saying, numbers don't lie, only _____. [you can fill the _____ with whatever, I like 'salesperson'] update: ____ should be wall-street-analysts /OT/ there are too many tunables, and I really don't want to spend all my waking hours tunning, but once in a while, I do check performance, and running top, iostat, nfsstat, etc, sometimes show a 'congestion'. the problem I encounter very often, is that what is a great solution for one, might be disastrous for another. ZFS is the new kid in town, and so far I am quiet happy - have 2 in production, and the new one will be very soon, it's being used to train/learn/play but will go online very soon, then it will be hammered by several projects, and it would-be-nice to have some tool to watch performance and be able to do some tunning, to quote tunefs: 'You can tune a file system, but you cannot tune a fish.' babbling on a rainy day, danny