From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jan  5 22:00:10 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA27006
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 22:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA26925
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 22:00:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id QAA09753; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 16:55:08 +1100
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 1996 16:55:08 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199601060555.QAA09753@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..?
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>> I'd like to see a 2.1-SNAP first.  We've had quite a few bug
>> fixes since 2.1-Release.

>Hmmm.  I just looked through the 206K or so of diffs between
>RELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE and the RELENG_2_1_0 HEAD and I don't see
>anything there that would really merit a 2.1 SNAP though..

Someone should look through the diffs between RELENG_2_1_0 and HEAD to
see if 2.1++ is missing anything important.  These diffs are also 206K
or so.  Lines :-(.

Bruce