From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 08:15:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336B816A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:15:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (storm.uk.FreeBSD.org [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8CC43D4C for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:15:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.uk.FreeBSD.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA38FAlf073453; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:15:10 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost)iA38F9Vj073452; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:15:09 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grovel.grondar.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA38CoYL001435; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 08:12:50 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Message-Id: <200411030812.iA38CoYL001435@grovel.grondar.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Mike Jeays From: Mark Murray In-Reply-To: Your message of "02 Nov 2004 19:20:45 EST." <1099441245.761.6.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:12:50 +0000 Sender: mark@grondar.org cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speed of light? [was Re: GPL vs BSD Licence] X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:15:17 -0000 [ massive trimming appied ] Mike Jeays writes: > Doesn't this equate to defining the speed of light as constant, and then > adjusting the metre and second appropriately? I thought the constancy > of the speed of light was a basic assumption taken by Einstein; the > slowing of time and reduction of lengths of moving objects, or those in > a gravitational field are a consequence. This is correct. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH