From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 11:47:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8509F16A468; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:47:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (kazi.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BCF13C448; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l51BYcAV092436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.fit.vutbr.cz (8.14.1/8.13.1/Submit) id l51BYcGJ092435; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:34:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz) X-Authentication-Warning: kazi.fit.vutbr.cz: cejkar set sender to cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz using -f Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:34:38 +0200 From: Rudolf Cejka To: Pang Message-ID: <20070601113437.GA91061@fit.vutbr.cz> References: <465ED66F.30902@laws.ms> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <465ED66F.30902@laws.ms> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 147.229.8.12 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Download speed and TCPIP window sizing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:47:01 -0000 Pang wrote (2007/05/31): > I have asked many techs in Asianetcom and they blamed on TCPIP window > sizing. I am not sure what it is, so I do a search in Google and find More typical problem than TCP window size is Ethernet connection itself, for example one side thinks it has 100 Mb/s half duplex and the second side thinks that it has 100 Mb/s full duplex, which results in speeds around 10 - 100 KB/s. -- Rudolf Cejka http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic