From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Nov 16 17:31:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C287B37B401; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 17:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from yello.shallow.net (yello.shallow.net [203.18.243.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B998C43E42; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 17:31:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joshua@shallow.net) Received: by yello.shallow.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 20DBA2A5B; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:30:55 +1100 (EST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:30:55 +1100 From: Joshua Goodall To: Edwin Groothuis Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/45178: Maintainer update: net/spread Message-ID: <20021117013054.GR33758@roughtrade.net> References: <200211162234.gAGMYV7s073002@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211162234.gAGMYV7s073002@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 02:34:31PM -0800, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Instead of fetching the distfile from your site, I have, because > of their download restrictions, not put in a MASTER_SITE but let > the user know about the download site and tell him what to do. I have to question that; the restriction around source distribution of Spread is the standard BSD clause! What made this any different? Joshua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message