From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 8 19:21:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A6C106566B; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 19:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:63:1281::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CC98FC1B; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 19:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from websrv01.jr-hosting.nl (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:63:1281::4]) by mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B26A1CC26; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [2001:888:15a5:0:21e:c2ff:febc:d902] by websrv01.jr-hosting.nl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1OiBQo-0004B6-3C; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:21:14 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Remko Lodder In-Reply-To: <20100808191907.GA26232@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:21:12 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2BB5984C-596F-4E81-93F5-A6910D8B85BF@elvandar.org> References: <201008062159.o76LxsbT064236@repoman.freebsd.org> <19550.59049.226541.911898@gossamer.timing.com> <20100808191907.GA26232@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Ollivier Robert , Matthias Andree , "portmgr@freebsd.org" , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, John Hein Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mercurial Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:21:15 -0000 On Aug 8, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:17:29AM -0600, John Hein wrote: >> Indeed. That is completely my fault. I sent Ollivier the incomplete >> patch. >=20 > The question, however, remains: how could Ollivier possibly commit > severaly broken submission? Are we guys totally omit testing stuff we > about to check in these days? :-( >=20 > ./danfe every 100 commits, one fails, Ollivier does his best, and so are you and = the others, but we all (including you and me) make a mistake every now and then :) I am pretty sure that the next time a patch pops up , Ollivier will try = to do his best + 1, to prevent this from happening. Thanks, Remko --=20 /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News